EPA regulates air pollution from medical waste incinerators

It’s a rare day that the EPA actually does something positive for the environment (especially lately), which is why today’s news is such a pleasant surprise. Yesterday, the agency decided it would start regulating air pollution emitted from medical waste incinerators. (In other words, the Clean Air Act is actually being strengthened in this case, not weakened). We know, it’s a shocker—take a moment to breathe deeply into a brown paper bag, then read on.

The rule, which was published in the Federal Registry yesterday and has a 75-day public comment period before it will be finalized, will require medical waste facilities to install filters and scrubbers to capture toxic particulates and gasses emitted from incinerators. Currently incinerators burn 146,000 tons of waste per year (including items like needles, biological waste, and batteries), releasing toxins like mercury and dioxins into the air which then affect nearby communities and ecosystems.

The new regulation comes after an 11-year battle between the EPA and environmental groups like Earthjustice, the Sierra Club, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). Earthjustice first sued the EPA for its weak air pollution standards for waste incinerators in 1997. Under the Bush administration, the EPA dragged its heels for 11 long years until a second lawsuit finally pushed the agency to act.

From today’s Washington Post:

“This is the first time I’ve ever seen them to an air toxic rule right,” said Jim Pew, a lawyer at Earthjustice, a Calif.-based environmental advocacy group that sued the agency over its initial proposal for regulating the incinerators more than a decade ago. “It’s a big cut in emissions.”


The rules represent a significant change from the EPA’s 1997 proposal, which Earthjustice successfully challenged in court on behalf of the Sierra Club. In almost every instance, the agency has reduced the amount of allowable pollutants by at least a factor of 10: Acceptable hydrogen chloride levels will drop from 15 parts per million in the atmosphere to 0.75 per million.

Now if only the EPA would implement stringent rules against oil and gas leasing near national parks, power plants emitting more pollutants, oil shale drilling in public lands





I have a very efficient concept which may be the new generation of disposing medical instrumentation, human body/animal carcuses, and other applications. A concept eleminating air pollution, and high cost. I'm 99.9percent sure that if the EPA can be convinced of this enriching concept, it would become a MANDATORY application experating inceneration. How can I ensure my credit in presenting this to the EPA? It is a very simple concept which has been in front of our faces, and presumingly holds no excuse for not executing any regulations to enforce this applicating mandatory. How can I ensure credit for this wether it's financail, or affiliating future with the EPA is why I'm taking slow, precautios steps in presenting this wonderful in MANY ways technique.